<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TestPartner Review &#8211; Final</title>
	<atom:link href="http://testautomationblog.com/2009/10/04/test-partner-review-final/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://testautomationblog.com/2009/10/04/test-partner-review-final/</link>
	<description>On software test automation and quality assurance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TAB</title>
		<link>http://testautomationblog.com/2009/10/04/test-partner-review-final/comment-page-1/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>TAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testautomationblog.com/?p=83#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point. In fact TestPartner is probably an ok choice for automating native Windows applications. It even has a feature called &#039;image maps&#039; which allows you to automate controls that are not recognized by the tool, based only on the way how they appear on the screen. I used it once to create tests for a graphical diagramming application similar to Visio. The image maps are in fact bitmaps (for example a picture of the button that you want to click), that TestPartner can search on the screen. If it sounds unreliable, that&#039;s probably because it is – you have to keep the windows color, resolution and font settings always the same, but it can be your last resort if nothing else works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point. In fact TestPartner is probably an ok choice for automating native Windows applications. It even has a feature called &#8216;image maps&#8217; which allows you to automate controls that are not recognized by the tool, based only on the way how they appear on the screen. I used it once to create tests for a graphical diagramming application similar to Visio. The image maps are in fact bitmaps (for example a picture of the button that you want to click), that TestPartner can search on the screen. If it sounds unreliable, that&#8217;s probably because it is – you have to keep the windows color, resolution and font settings always the same, but it can be your last resort if nothing else works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish Khoo</title>
		<link>http://testautomationblog.com/2009/10/04/test-partner-review-final/comment-page-1/#comment-2915</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish Khoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testautomationblog.com/?p=83#comment-2915</guid>
		<description>I agree. I used to work at a company that used TestPartner for some time and we found it very buggy and generally unpleasant to use, especially in teams of more than one automater. For web applications I would definitely not use it as there are much better alternatives, but for desktop apps this may be a good option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I used to work at a company that used TestPartner for some time and we found it very buggy and generally unpleasant to use, especially in teams of more than one automater. For web applications I would definitely not use it as there are much better alternatives, but for desktop apps this may be a good option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
