<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Test Automation Blog &#187; post-mortem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://testautomationblog.com/tag/post-mortem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://testautomationblog.com</link>
	<description>On software test automation and quality assurance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 09:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Failed Automation Projects</title>
		<link>http://testautomationblog.com/2009/05/13/failed-automation-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://testautomationblog.com/2009/05/13/failed-automation-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TAB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-mortem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testautomationblog.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Do not automate buggy software."


I was thinking about the failed automation projects I’ve been involved in during the last few years and I seem to find a pattern. All those projects were very, very buggy. I realize now that you should only aim to automate functionality which is fairly stable, so that you do not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>"<span lang="EN">Do not automate buggy software."</span></em></p>
<div><span lang="EN"></span></div>
<p><span lang="EN"><span lang="EN"></p>
<p dir="ltr" align="left">I was thinking about the failed automation projects I’ve been involved in during the last few years and I seem to find a pattern. All those projects were very, very buggy. I realize now that you should only aim to automate functionality which is fairly stable, so that you do not expect to see a test failure in more than about 1 of 10 test runs. If you see that your tests are failing 50% of the time, then automation is not the cure for your problems. Try to find out why this is happening in the first place.</p>
<p> </p>
<p></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testautomationblog.com/2009/05/13/failed-automation-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
